TV REVIEW
Channel surfer
By
Randeep
Wadehra
Traditionally, we have treated
news TV as a source of information. People expect news editors to discriminate
between what matters to media houses and what should actually matter to the nation
at large. This twin pressure of maintaining healthy bottom lines and keeping
credibility intact in the public eye does strange things to the form and
content of TV news. Thus, national news channels provide primetime slots to
something that is actually a local incident, deserving a few seconds in ‘speed
news’ or ‘news briefs’ slots. Perhaps, one cannot blame the media. They have to
attract and retain eyeballs. This is where sensationalism comes in.
Last week, various news channels
showed a male police cop repeatedly slapping a young woman in a Ghaziabad police
station. Her fault? She was, allegedly, singing in her room after downing a peg
or two. News channels put it on primetime headlines. Times Now went further and
held a full-fledged discussion, with Arnab Goswami firing away uncomfortable
questions at the UP Police’s ADGP, and the invited panelists from human rights
and women’s rights organizations providing supporting fire. The cop did not
know what hit him; he had come prepared to croon the usual bureaucratese. However,
by the time they were through with him, he was reduced to a confused warbler. However,
did this incident require a primetime discussion on a national TV channel, when
the media had already given it appropriate treatment? I am sure, this would
have continued for a couple of days more if other “sensational” events had not
cropped up.
Like Sanjay Dutt’s “surrender” to the TADA
Court on Friday – an exclusive privilege of VIPs in India. An ordinary mortal
would have been unceremoniously arrested and thrown behind the bars – on mere
suspicion of a misdemeanor. However, the Bollywood star’s arrest was preceded
by unprecedented media hype – as if a great event of national importance was coming
up. The enthralled viewers watched Dutt’s acolytes and “friends” telling the
gullible what “a great human being” the cine star is! Wow, martyrdom redefined!
But, as so often happens with all things Bollywoodian, cricket has to make its
presence felt as a rival, or a companion, even when lime light gives way to
searchlights. This time, however, the much maligned police’s searchlights
caught some of the cricket stars crossing red lines in the ongoing IPL tamasha.
The most prominent being Sreesanth, who was once the spearhead of Indian
cricket teams; he was hoping to make a comeback for the forthcoming tour to
South Africa. For a change, the Delhi cops were sporting the “good guys” tag on
news channels. The Delhi Police Chief, Neeraj Kumar, on Zee News as well as
CNN-IBN, provided several details of the match fixing scandal and how his
force’s special cell unearthed it.
Our talk show pundits are loath
to miss such sensational developments. Every channel had a group of experts
clucking their tongues; Rajiv Shukla’s straight-faced “height of greed”
denunciation of the “three idiots” was itself the height of straightfacedness –
to coin a term. Despite Karan Thapar’s best efforts on Devil’s Advocate
(CNN-IBN), the BCCI honcho Srinivasan would not say anything more substantial
than calling the three RR cricketers as “bad eggs”. But panelists on other talk
shows assiduously dug up old scandals and tossed around tainted famous names
like googly bowlers. Talking of googlies, there was Lalit Modi’s deadpan
declaration on BBC that illegal betting stakes in IPL matches have reached as
high as one billion pounds “per game” and not “per season”. Arun Lal on NDTV
Hindi blamed it all on black money, and argued that if the government can
legalize betting on horse races why not on cricket too? Nevertheless, others
were uncomfortable with the idea. Still others alluded to the “ugly nexus”
among politicians, police and the underworld (read D Company) that has helped
betting syndicates take a throttlehold on the game of cricket, which has
attained the “status of religion” in the subcontinent. Well, every religion has
its share of apostates. So, what is so sensational about cricket having some?
After all various protestant movements against the mother religion, Test
Cricket, have already created rival sects in the form of ODIs and T20s. Does
“Kerry Packer” ring a bell? He had sent alarm bells ringing in the 1970s
cricket establishment. Now, that was real sensational stuff!
Published in The FinancialWorld dated May 20, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment