By
Randeep
Wadehra
It is neither his birth nor death anniversary, but one feels
impelled to invoke Mahatma Gandhi in the context of today’s political
happenings. During India’s struggle for independence, there were many political
stalwarts, who had contributed to India’s progress towards freedom. Gandhiji
was not only the tallest among them but also unique in his approach towards
promoting the cause of India’s independence. He never became a member of any
political party – not even of the Indian National Congress, which today claims
exclusive rights to his legacy. He never aspired for any political office nor
craved for material paybacks in any form. He went from one part of the
subcontinent to the other with just one purpose – to bring about emotional
integration that was so essential for having a united India, post-Independence.
He identified with the masses in a manner that no other political leader in
India or elsewhere could ever match. No wonder, his mere act of going on a fast
would galvanize the entire nation, transcending regional, religious and class
divides and send alarm bells ringing in the highest echelons of the British
Raj.
Another striking aspect of Gandhiji’s applied politics was
that he never followed the masses but commanded their obedience by dint of
sheer moral force. He never succumbed to populism, nor did he appeal to the
base instincts of lesser political activists. He blazed a unique trail in the
political field by creating an entirely new template for political activism.
Today, it has become fashionable to deride the Mahatma for his fasting and
pacifism. But fasting was not a tool of blackmail as is being made out by his
detractors today. If you look at his five-day fasting after the Chauri Chaura
incident, you will realize that he did it as penance because he felt
responsible for the violence. He was convinced that his leadership was not
strong enough to keep the movement peaceful. Therefore, fasting became an act
of self-purification that strengthened his moral fiber as well as his resolve
to continue with his pursuit of India’s independence within the larger
framework of uprightness, dignity and justice for all. He gave the masses a
vision of united India where everybody would live in peace and with
self-respect. His Ram Rajya was more a political ideal than a religious
shibboleth. In those days, when untouchability was rampant, he dared to break
the social taboo. He took on the conservative core of the Hindu society and did
what was considered unthinkable in those times. There were other acts too,
which irked even his most committed followers. But he never hesitated in
practicing them if he was convinced that these promoted common good.
When India became independent, he was not even present in the
national capital where lesser politicians were congregating in their unstated
quest for the fishes and loaves of political office. His selfless service to
the nation elevated Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi from being a mere masterful
political strategist to the lofty status of the Mahatma, who had ensured that
neither he nor any member of his family ever enjoyed the fruits of political
power. He set a benchmark that is yet to be touched by any other politician or
social-political activist. The inheritors of his legacy were not his children
or grandchildren but the people of India. And how have we, the people of India,
guarded and nurtured this legacy?
Familism and nepotism dominate throughout the country.
Invariably it is the son or the daughter who succeeds the parent to a political
office. Consequently, we have dynasties at the centre as well as the various
states. Things have come to such a pass that a politician can dare proclaim to
the media, “hum sarkar hain” and there is no sense of outrage even among those
sections of the polity who consider themselves more evolved than the commoners.
The effete elite of India remain as spineless as ever. They had acquiesced in
the propagation of the Raj and now they do the same in perverting Gandhiji’s
legacy. As for the political class, let us look at some of its members.
When chips are down even a young and “progressive” leader
like Akhilesh Singh Yadav, UP’s present chief minister, becomes chip of the old
block. He had raised hopes of a better governed Uttar Pradesh. Young and
educated, he was supposedly exposed to the liberal democratic ethos during his
stay in Australia. Moreover, he is said to be an environment engineer by
qualification and training. A person with such curriculum vitae would normally
be expected to back Durga Shakti Nagpal’s action against the sand mafia. Instead,
he did the exact opposite. Such thoughtless actions turn chaos into something
far more sinister, eventually. We have witnessed how the liquor mafia,
epitomized by the slain Ponty Chaddha, had become potent enough to steer all
administrative decisions relating to liquor trade in his favor, irrespective of
whether it was Mulayam or Mayawati in power. Now, since other mafias too have
political godfathers, one can imagine the sort of governance operating in the
blighted state of Uttar Pradesh. However, what is true of Uttar Pradesh is also
true of other states in the country – without exception.
Once a politician becomes a prisoner of vested interests, he
ceases to be a leader of any consequence, and becomes a timeserver who dares
not take any independent initiative relating to even quotidian administrative
affairs let alone formulating a comprehensive governance related policy. Even those politicians who emerge from humble
backgrounds, like Mayawati and Lalu Prasad Yadav, succumb to the “hum sarkar
hain” syndrome; the trappings of power trap them in the vortex of corruption,
crime, and cynical vote bank politics. Arrogance becomes the salient feature of
their dealings with the hapless common man – a sure sign of decay in the
political ecosystem. Further, it also indicates a huge leadership vacuum in our
political space. Consequently, we have petty deal makers as our political
leaders, who garner votes in exchange for populist sops. Little do they realize
that every such act is weakening the country’s democratic ethos. The contempt
that today’s neta is displaying for the common voter is going to return and
haunt him and uproot him from his cozy perch atop the heap.
Great souls like Mahatma Gandhi are once-in-a-millennium
phenomenon. It is time for us to revisit his precepts and practices and arrive
at a solution to stem the rot.
Published in The Financial World dated 09 August 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment